BASIC RESEARCH
AT LOS ALAMOS
Los Alamos: Laboratory
(1943-1944)
Events: Bringing It All
Together, 1942-1945
The first few months at Los Alamos
were occupied with briefings on nuclear physics for the technical staff and with
planning research priorities and organizing the laboratory. Leslie
Groves called once again on Warren Lewis
to head a committee, this time
to evaluate the Los Alamos program. The committee's recommendations
resulted in the coordinated effort envisioned by those who advocated a unified
laboratory for bomb research. Enrico Fermi
(right) took control of critical mass experiments and standardization of measurement
techniques. Plutonium purification work, begun at the Met
Lab, became high priority at Los Alamos, and increased attention was
paid to metallurgy. The committee also recommended that an engineering
division be organized to collaborate with physicists on bomb
design and fabrication. The laboratory was thus organized into
four divisions: theoretical (Hans A. Bethe, right); experimental physics (Robert F.
Bacher); chemistry and metallurgy (Joseph W. Kennedy); and ordnance (Navy
Captain William S. "Deke" Parsons). Like other Manhattan Project
installations, Los Alamos soon began to expand beyond initial
expectations.
As director,
J. Robert Oppenheimer
(below) shouldered burdens both large and small, managing the numerous mundane
matters such as living quarters, mail censorship, salaries, promotions,
and other "quality of life" issues that were inevitable in an intellectual
pressure-cooker with few social amenities.
Oppenheimer relied on a group
of advisers to help him keep the "big picture" in focus, while a
committee made up of Los Alamos group leaders provided day-to-day communications
between divisions.
Early experiments on both uranium and plutonium provided welcome
results. Uranium emitted neutrons in less than a billionth of a second --
just enough time, in the world of nuclear physics, for an efficient
explosion. Emilio Segrč (below)
later provided an additional cushion with his
discovery in December 1943 that, if cosmic rays were eliminated, the subcritical
uranium masses would not have to be
brought together as quickly as previously
thought; nor would the uranium have to be as pure. Muzzle velocity for the
scaled-down artillery piece could be lower, and the gun could be shorter and
lighter. Segrč's tests on the first samples of plutonium demonstrated that
plutonium emitted even more neutrons than uranium due to the spontaneous fission
of plutoniurn-240. Both theory and experimental data now agreed that a
bomb using either element would detonate if it could be designed and fabricated
into the correct size and shape. But many details remained to be worked
out, including calculations to determine how much uranium-235 or plutonium would
be needed for an explosive device.
Bacher's
experimental physics division patiently generated the essential cross
section measurements needed to calculate critical and efficient mass. The same
group utilized particle accelerators to produce the large numbers of neutrons
needed for its cross section experiments. Bacher's group also compiled data that helped identify tamper materials that would
most effectively push neutrons back to the core and enhance the efficiency of
the explosion. Despite Los Alamos's postwar reputation as a mysterious
retreat where brilliant scientists performed miracles of nuclear physics, much
of the work that led to the atomic bombs was extremely tedious.
The chemists' job was to purify the uranium-235 and plutonium,
reduce them to metals, and process the tamper material. Only highly
purified uranium and plutonium would be safe from predetonation.
Fortunately, purification standards for uranium were relatively modest, and the
chemical division was able to focus its effort on the lesser known plutonium and
make substantial progress on a multi-step precipitation process by summer
1944. The metallurgy division had to turn the purified uranium-235 and
plutonium into metal. Here, too, significant progress was made by summer
as the metallurgists adapted a stationary-bomb technique initially developed at
Iowa State College.
Parsons
(right), in charge of ordnance engineering, directed his staff
to design two artillery pieces of relatively standard specifications except for
their extremely light barrels -- one for a uranium bomb and one for a plutonium
bomb. The guns needed to achieve high velocities, but they would not
have to be durable since they would only be fired once. Here again early
efforts centered on the more problematic plutonium weapon, which required a
higher velocity due to its higher risk of predetonation. Two plutonium
guns arrived in March 1944 and were field-tested successfully. In the same
month, two uranium guns were ordered.

Click
here to view sources and notes for this page.